Johnny Depp’s attorneys — Camille Vasquez and Benjamin Chew — say the actor might generously waive the $10 million in damages that a jury ordered Amber Heard to pay him. During a recent interview, the lawyers agreed that the trial used to be “never about cash,” just days after the Aquaman actress's lawyer admitted that she “absolutely” did not have the cash to pay her ex-husband.
In considered one of their first TV interviews since the conclusion of the bombshell defamation trial remaining week, Vasquez and Chew appeared on Good Morning America to discuss the verdict with George Stephanopoulos.
When the dialog turned towards the $10 million judgment against heard, Stephanopoulos noted that the actress would possibly not have the approach to pay for the eight-figure penalty. The host wondered the attorneys, asking if Depp's would be keen to let her off the hook for the invoice.
“You have stated that the function was once not to impoverish Ms. Heard; is it imaginable that lets see a settlement the place she foregoes the attraction in return for Mr. Depp waving any financial damages?” the host asked the lawyers, to which Mr. Chew answered: “This used to be about restoring his recognition, and he has carried out that.”
“So you’re not disclosing any privileges, however it feels like that’s something that could be on the desk, but it surely’s as much as Ms. Heard?” Stephanopoulos followed up.
“We should be cautious what we say, however this was once about Mr. Depp’s popularity; that’s what it used to be about for him,” Mr. Chew mentioned, adding that the Pirates of the Caribbean megastar was “over the moon” when he was told about the verdict.
He persisted: “It used to be like the burden of the arena have been taken off his shoulders, and I believe that finally, after six years, he’s gotten his lifestyles back.”
Heard’s legal professional, Elaine Bredehoft, sat down for an interview with Savannah Guthrie of NBC’s Today display remaining week, where she denied that her shopper may pay the judgment and accused Depp’s legal crew of “demonizing” the actress.
“Is she ready to pay a 10.4-million-dollar judgment,” Guthrie requested, to which Bredehoft shook her head and replied: “Oh no, completely no longer.”
A jury discovered that the actress defamed her ex-husband and awarded him $10 million in compensatory damages, and $Five million in punitive damages. The pass judgement on presiding over the case decreased the punitive damages to $350,000.
Source: Independent, Dailymail
ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7tbTEq6CcoJWowW%2BvzqZmq6GTnXqxu9aeqZ%2BtnGS3sLTNp7BmnJWlvW65yKCfrWWjpa6zsYyapJudomK1pq3RnWSfqp%2Bieqe1zZqlnKGRoXqzwcinZg%3D%3D