The 15 Worst Reboots And Remakes Of All Time

May 2024 · 15 minute read

Quick Links

Remakes and reboots are a true double-edged sword. One the one hand, you will have quick name reputation and thus enthusiasts are intrigued. You can put a good spin on it, update it for contemporary audiences and, in a couple of rare cases, make it even better and well regarded. That contains reboots as we’ve seen great good fortune with James Bond, Batman and Planet of the Apes among the homes that have had glorious new begins for success.

However, the quantity of screw ups outweigh the successes. For too long, Hollywood has overlooked what makes a movie (or, every so often TV display) work in the first position and make as many errors as imaginable looking to give it a brand new spin. Bad course or writing, a poor celebrity, they have got their effects but there’s also grand interference and just utterly ignoring what made the original work. There were slews of examples in films and television however the worst of the worst is notable for just how a long way they are able to omit the attempt to deliver a vintage to new lifestyles. Here are 15 of the worst remakes and reboots from both movies and tv and why now and again, it’s easiest to leave the authentic alone.

15. The Amazing Spider-Man

by way of whatleydude.com

It’s true that Spider-Man 3 used to be identified as a horrible effort so an try to kick issues back up made some sense. However, a total reboot just 5 years later threw many and it didn’t assist that the final effort attempted a Dark Knight motif, which doesn’t are compatible Spider-Man at all. Andrew Garfield used to be excellent in the lead however still got here off too mopey for Peter Parker and Emma Stone seemed an extraordinary choice for Gwen Stacey. The plotline of the Lizard didn’t connect as smartly and neither did the communicate of a grand conspiracy involving Peter’s parents. The movie did do well enough for a sequel which was once even worse with the attempts to shove in Electro, the Green Goblin, Shailene Woodley doing several scenes as Mary Jane Watson best to have her section utterly cut out of the film and a desperate attempt to arrange an enormous quantity of spin-offs…which have all been cancelled with Marvel Studios getting the persona again for the MCU. Thus, those motion pictures stand as a complete waste of those concerned, seeking to make Spider-Man too similar to Batman and what occurs when you try to create a complete cinematic universe ahead of you'll be able to even get the first part of it proper.

(*15*)14. Around the World in 80 Days

via unionfilms.org

Jules Verne’s vintage journey has noticed variations from a Pierce Brosnan mini-series to the star-studded 1956 Best Picture Oscar winner. The 2004 adaptation is the vintage case of retaining the title and bare bones plot and tossing everything else. The issue was once that this was once never intended to concentrate on adventurer Phileas Fogg (Steve Coogan) but reasonably his servant Passepartout, played by way of martial arts star Jackie Chan. Thus, much of the film comes to Chan’s mix of motion and comedy which grew to become this right into a peculiar shaping of elements, including a few wild cameos (Arnold Schwarzenegger as a prince). The attempt to flip this right into a family-friendly movie just added to the issues of the story, the distraction of Chan’s personality and a waste of amusing appearances (corresponding to Kathy Bates as Queen Victoria) to finally end up a massive field place of business flop and evidence of what happens when you stray a ways too much from the original material.

 

13. Clash of the Titans

via fanpop.com

The authentic 1981 film is standard for its campy aspects and the terrific stop-motion animation of Ray Harryhausen. Sadly, the 2010 remake flushed that all down the bathroom for wild CGI and a too-serious tone that just made it laughable. Ignoring most of the tale of the authentic, Sam Worthington didn’t work as hero Perseus and segments supposed to be great (reminiscent of the combat with Medusa) had been marred because of the push for poor-looking effects. Liam Neeson and Ralph Finnes simply seemed bored of their roles as gods and the surprising try to flip it right into a 3-d format handiest served to make the movie glance even worse. It controlled sufficient cash to make an (even worse) sequel but best serves as a reminder of how some distance much more amusing the authentic was once.

12. Oz the Great and Powerful

by way of superbwallpapers.com

Described as a “non secular prequel,” this 2013 film continues to be buzzed about getting a sequel to build on the vintage stories, thanks to a monster field place of job take. However, maximum would prefer this to stand some distance on its own as mainly spitting on the magic of the stories. The miscasting was once all over the position: James Franco as the supposedly smarmy Wizard but now not that likeable; Michelle Williams too young-looking for Glinda; Rachel Weisz wasted as one conniving queen whilst Mila Kunis used to be awful as the Wicked Witch. The truth this can be a film Johnny Depp passed on will have to say volumes as the CGI used to be a long way too distracting and the storyline weak. While a good fortune at the field workplace, the stories of Oz don’t lend themselves as smartly to a modern day Hollywood blockbuster and a key reason why this movie lacks true magic.

11. The Ladykillers

by way of movpins.com

No one is very best, now not even the Coen Brothers. On paper, Ladykillers was once proper up their alley, the 1955 British movie a vintage black comedy a couple of gang of thieves whose makes an attempt to use a house for a robbery are undone through the overbearing landlady. But the Coens’ effort was once marred from the start via Tom Hanks woefully miscast as the chief of the bunch. With a foul beard and one of the most terrible Southern accents ever put on film, Hanks was a ways too over the best for what was once supposed to be a satire and turned it into bad comedy. The attempts at darkness just turned slapstick and beneath the efforts of the brothers as their normally good writing delivered an overly lazy script. A deficient box place of job take sealed its destiny and whilst they'd bounce back with No Country For Old Men, this displays how even masters of their craft can’t imply a really perfect remake.

10. A Nightmare on Elm Street

via projectdeadpost.com

The factor with any attempts to remake or reboot this classic franchise is that such a lot of the luck rested on Robert Englund’s fantastic performance as Freddy Kruger. Good as he's, Jackie Earle Haley was once never going to most sensible that and came off a pale imitation. It didn’t lend a hand that the film overlooked the terrific psychological thrills of the unique in desire of “slasher scares” and Wes Craven used to be publically disappointed about now not being contacted to participate in the project. While some had been sort, maximum believed this used to be a series far on its own with out the try to magic it up with CGI. The film was a field place of business hit however most true enthusiasts of the original in finding it a poor try to “replace” a movie that is still so terrifying these days and maximum hang the unique in a long way upper regard.

9. Planet of the Apes

by the use of collider.com

The recent revival of the Apes franchise has been fairly remarkable, more so given how maximum idea it used to be useless and buried after Tim Burton’s 2001 flop. It had so much promise with Burton’s quirky taste and the concept of Charlton Heston as an ape was once a priceless cameo. But it simply failed to attach, Mark Wahlberg now not the excellent actor he would turn into and thus misplaced, the more than a few actors like Tim Roth and Helena Bonham Carter buried underneath the makeup and Estella Warren simply eye candy as a human slave. Of path, what everyone recollects is the finishing, which comes out of nowhere, makes zero sense and simply highlights what a missed opportunity this used to be. It took a decade for the franchise to get again on the right track with a real reboot and proves how a big-name director can incessantly harm, greater than help, a remake.

8. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles

via designbolts.com

From the moment it was once announced Michael Bay used to be going to provide a revival of the classic ‘90’s mega-franchise, there have been worries, if no longer outright panic, among its fanatics. It got worse with reviews of an early script that had the Turtles as aliens. While that used to be modified, the ultimate outcome nonetheless didn’t cross over smartly. The all-CGI for the Turtles appeared terrible (to not point out how making them giants robbed a really perfect “little guy in opposition to odds” bit that made the series paintings) and the juvenile jokes didn’t lend a hand. Megan Fox regarded great but her “performing” made April a loss of a personality and the baffling plotline involving the Shredder and the insane route (that seemed to haven't any understanding how to straighten out a digicam) simply led to something painful to look at. It if truth be told has a sequel coming which is exceptional given the way it played far more as a parody of the TMNT franchise than the actual factor and now not many who longing for extra.

7. Arthur

by way of filmofilia.com

Yes, it was once only some years ago that Hollywood executives were convinced Russell Brand was once going to be the subsequent comedy mega-star. True, he used to be excellent in supporting roles however now not as smartly in a major leading one as proven through this remake of the 1981 hit. Dudley Moore had a nice appeal to win you over to the position of a under the influence of alcohol millionaire however Brand was just too for your face with the “humor” and performing the jerk to be as successful and thus the complete film used to be thrown off. Even the presence of Helen Mirren as his protector and Jennifer Garner as his lover couldn’t spark things as the film was ripped by means of critics as an unpleasant mess that completely overlooked why the first was so appealing. A box workplace disappointment, it most effective served to hurt Brand’s standing in Hollywood moderately than serving to and why Moore was one of a kind.

6. Terminator Genisys

via onefilmfan.com

This was once intended to get the Terminator franchise back on course and while it did smartly at the field office, most see it as a in reality epic disaster. Having Arnold Schwarzenegger back in the iconic position appeared promising but Jai Courtney and Emilia Clarke were very faded shadows of Michael Biehn and Linda Hamilton. Of path, they key drawback was the story, a completely baffling combine of time shuttle paradoxes, attempts to link to the authentic movie whilst additionally undoing it, the CGI excess of the top and just a mash of dramatic beats that failed to connect. That’s not to mention that the one actually great twist of the movie (John Connor being a Terminator himself) was given away in the trailers. The film may have been successful out of the country however most lovers have trashed it as a complete mess that simply tarnishes, no longer honors, the movie sequence and how looking to put modern results in a vintage tale simply ends up in trouble.

5. The Women

via aceshowbiz.com

The 1939 film in line with the stage play was acclaimed for being groundbreaking in specializing in a look at a batch of ladies friends as they are trying to help one of their staff out when she realizes her husband is dishonest on her. It was once principally the Sex and the City of its time most effective a lot smarter. One would suppose writer/director Diane English could be great for the 2008 remake to carry the tale to trendy times. It had a excellent cast of Annette Benning, Debra Messing, Jada Pinkett Smith and Meg Ryan and saved the a laugh touch of completely no male stars. Sadly, the final results had been a mess, Roger Ebert one of the few who preferred it and extra simply for giving such a lot of feminine actresses a push somewhat than the film itself. Most said English just couldn’t make a 1930’s story paintings for a modern target market, the clash of cultures coming off terrible, the actresses just now not clicking smartly as an ensemble and the film used to be a massive flop. A shame a powerful female solid may get this sort of uncooked deal.

4. The Wicker Man

via flashbackbackslide.com

How do you flip a remake of a classic thriller right into a funny story? Cast Nicolas Cage. The 1973 unique was an unbelievable horror experience that amped up the stress earlier than its brutally darkish finishing. The 2006 version performed like a horrible parody with Cage turning in a daft efficiency (sure even by way of his requirements) as a cop monitoring a missing lady on a small island run through a cult of girls and what occurs subsequent must be noticed to be believed. From yelling to shoot-outs to punching a girl out while wearing a bear gown to the now notorious “Not the bees!” second, Cage provides a performance that makes Al Pacino at his worst look like the fashion of quiet subtlety. To top it all off, it has a determination to rocker Johnny Ramone who had nothing to do with the film. A massive bomb, it’s develop into oddly popular in the “so dangerous you must see it” means and how Cage just makes it superb in such a lot of techniques.

3. Godzilla

via denofgeek.us

One of the greatest instances ever of what occurs when over-hyping backfires. Following the luck of Independence Day, Dean Devlin and Roland Emmerich planned a remake of the iconic Japanese monster and promised an unbelievable spectacle. For months on end, ads touted its presence (“his foot is as huge as this bus”) and the tag line “Size does topic.” It was expected to be the largest hit of 1998…and then it opened. The evaluations were blended with maximum thinking the human actors (Matthew Broderick and Jean Reno amongst them) lost amid a tale that went too a ways for comedy and failed to supply the thrills promised. The huge factor was Godzilla himself as it changed into obvious the refusal not to display him in trailers used to be less impact and extra how bad it appeared, a Jurassic Park knock-off that had none of the energy or appeal of the original version. The film used to be a success but no longer the huge hit anticipated and while the 2014 model had flaws, it’s nonetheless observed as significantly better than this. Indeed, the later Japanese movies overtly mocked this as “no longer the actual Godzilla,” a feeling many enthusiasts more than back up.

2. Fantastic Four

by means of youtube.com

There’s a whole e book to be written on how Fox’ strive this year to reboot the comedian ebook belongings failed on each degree. Josh Trank seemed a deficient choice because of his lack of revel in and the undeniable fact that if any belongings must no longer have a “grounded and sensible” method, it’s the FF. By now, the stories are legendary of the studio interference, the consistent rewrites and reshoots (you can obviously inform the place Kate Mara is wearing a hideous wig) and thus simple to peer them as trashing Trank’s work. At the same time, Trank advised his actors to not learn the comics as he didn’t need them influenced by the source subject matter and was once ok with such things as Doctor Doom turned into a goofy scientist sort. That’s not to point out nonetheless the issues of pacing, storyline, Michael B. Jordan’s casting extra of a distraction than a help and all culminating in a disaster horrible past fanatics’ expectancies. It’s no wonder there’s a push for Disney/Marvel to shop for back the rights and give the FF their due as this is already ranking high amongst the worst comic guide films of all time thanks to how the battle of director and studio ruined a bid for a brand new generation.

1. Psycho

by means of cinemajam.com

The point of a remake is to try and give a film a new spin, take it in a brand new course and a brand new eye. Which is why Gus Van Sant’s 1998 movie has to most sensible this checklist. Trying to remake Alfred Hitchcock’s 1960 film, regarded as one of the biggest thriller masterpieces of all time, used to be silly enough. The film was much a product of its time with the stunning shower scene and killing off Janet Leigh best half an hour in. To try and recreate that feeling gave the impression a poor move. But the truly baffling contact was that Van Sant determined this is able to be a shot-for-shot remake, the use of the very same angles and lighting fixtures Hitchcock had. Why someone would choose such an idiotic direction, let by myself any individual as proficient as Van Sant, is beyond belief and it pretty much doomed the project.

Of course, it already had problems. Lovely as Anne Heche is, she lacked the high quality (and star power) that made Leigh’s demise in the unique this sort of big deal. Also, Vince Vaughn was miscast as Norman Bates, his makes an attempt as menace coming off extra laughable and threw the whole thing off. The film used to be savaged by means of critics who noticed totally no level in this strive and whilst Van Sant has defended it, it nonetheless comes off as one of the weakest attempts at a major remake ever.

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7tbTEq6CcoJWowW%2BvzqZmnrCgmru0tdWeZKWhlprAtcXLnmatoJVifnZ51qiprKxdp7Kju86tqmaZnpl6s7HMmqKeq12ks26ty6VkraGdmnw%3D